Flashback 2005: Which No. Jersey?

[DIEHARD]

What do you all think about the prototype jersey selection?

[DIEHARD]

[DIEHARD]

[League Freak]

I like Option 1 and 2.


I like them because I dont think the brighter colours are tough enough....especially for such a cool logo.

[eelectrica]

Option 3 for mine. Don't mind 1 either.

[DIEHARD]

I like 1 and 4.

I just hope the end product is better than Reebok's Melbourne Storm away jersey. Which is the worst jersey in history.

And I hope the final jerseys have collars. Fans don't want to pay $180 for a glorified t shirt, they want to be able to wear them around. Fans want collars. We are rugby league, not soccer, afl or basketball.

I'm a big fan of having a jersey have elements that look like armour.

[Super Cronk]

option 1 is my fave one out of all of them...they arent bad designs.

[League Freak]

Yes, collars for sure.

[Queenslander]

I have gone for option 2 for 2 reasons, the design is cool and the colour doesnt clash with other clubs

[DIEHARD]

4 is growing on me more than 1 now.

[Green Machine]

I like 4 the most, but i think they look to much like the English Super League jerseys to be honest. Jerseys need to have collars, plain and simple. You see the broncos and storms jerseys they look like bonds shirts. Collars is a must.

[DIEHARD]

Yea the Broncos and Storm need to bring back collars.

Please Gold Coast, have collars.

[KingoftheGoldCoast]

1 and 3. 5 and 6 are too plain.

[TITANMAN]

Gudday lads, Number 2 is the best, anything better than the broncos crap is good, at last we can stop hearing about the broncos choking year after year...

[Hyperion]

I voted for option one. I like number four, but wouldn't the 'T' be broken when a sponsors logo is introduced?