NRL: Should the Tigers remove Prince from the captaincy in 2006?

[DeeGan]

NRL: Should the Tigers remove Prince from the captaincy in 2006?

Easy one, poll your vote and reasoning why.

Cheers

[Titanium_BD1103]

NO.. because he is the best man for the job and was the one who led them to the Premiership last year..

In saying that, sadly he will most probably be removed... and that illustrates the sour grapes attitude that runs in the Tigers IMO... it seems that for the ex-players that as soon as someone jumps ship.. they should be lambasted for it... and that is even though these ex players did the same thing..

[DeeGan]

I voted NO.

Prince is the best man for the job in 2006 and the Tigers should ride this out with him at the helm looking for the best man in 2007 at the same time. Hodgson would be a contender as would Skandalis.

[Dakink]

I voted no - though I have read else where that he will be removed by Sheens, giveing the job to someone who will be there. He is there leader and not likely to put any less effort in! League is a game that if you play tryng to preserve yourself you'll do more damage!

[..::Coops::..]

i voted no.
i think whoever is the best player for the job should be captain,if he is the best for the job he should keep it.

[Steelers]

He DEFINATELY should keep the captaincy. He is heading to the Titans in 2007, not 2006. His mind right now is to get the Tigers back-2-back premierships.

[Eel 33]

I voted YES, Brett Hodgson is the man for the job seeing as he re-signed a long term contract last year and is one the few senior players remaining. Skandalis is rumoured to be heading to England after this season and other players are still making a name for themselves.

[Queenslander]

I voted NO; why shake up a premership winning team and cause some possible disharmony between players and officials. They know that Prince is the best man for the job; so if the club does this then its only because of sour grapes.