Souths with Crowes money remind me of that old saying:
"You cant wrap a turd in gold paper"
Souths with Crowes money remind me of that old saying:
"You cant wrap a turd in gold paper"
The answer to that is simple, the Gold Coast Titans.
You have got to be kidding right!
Obviously you are not really following the progress of the club. I was speaking to a business owner on the weekend who has been trying to get a corporate box at Skilled Park next year and they are all gone. With the corporate backing and a large fan base(evident by having second highest crowd attendance this season), I'm sure the Titans are here to stay.
Originally Posted by nrl.com
The tits are kidding themselves.
They are just going to be used for pleasure, 80 mins a weekend and thrown out soon after, moving on.
On Sportstab Head to Head,
South Sydney $1.45
Gold Coast $2.65
On Sportsbet Head to Head,
South Sydney $1.47
Gold Coast $2.70
We are giving them 6.5 start
I can predict the future, so can the odd setters.
Nostridamus? Pitty your crystal doesn't have spell check.
Originally Posted by Coaster
Just to let everyone know, we are not going to allow users to come here merely just to start flame wars or bait and fish, also we expect our clubs fans not to take any bait.
We will be keeping an eye on it. And anyone guilty will get a week's time out.
We appreciate users from other teams signing up but be productive. I don't want to see these endless circular arguements over which team is better or sucks the most.
JOIN THE NEW FORUM AT https://www.titansupporters.com/forum/
PUT EM TO THE SWORD! SHOW SOME STEEL!
Moejoe: "REMEMBER!!!! SLIP - SLOP - SLAP in the sun. Skin Cancer is a growing problem. It could happen to anyone!!"TITANS, DIEHARDS, WARRINGTON WOLVES, MAROONS, KANGAROOS, HONG KONG THUNDER
What do u excpet mate, its redfern, the government has to do somethign to get your unearned money back in their coffers, like giving souths good odds so you all place your bets then lose.
friend is out, ian is in but
this mean amos in? or hilder goes to hooker, or ever campbell?
I can see you got the idea from the Lockyer/Carroll situation but if a player defends in the one position he is still easy to attack, no matter who's beside him.
The ball player just draws the good defender and hits a big running forward at the weeker defender.
I prefer to see smaller players have freedom in defense. They should be chasing and annoying the attacking structure.